Here’s Why Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce Reportedly Skipped The Met Gala

By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/07 08:30:01
0
Share
copy
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA – FEBRUARY 02: Taylor Swift attends the 67th Annual GRAMMY Awards on ... More February 02, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images for The Recording Academy) Actors, singers, athletes, fashion designers, and more sported their finest looks at the 2025 Met Gala on May 5. Once again missing from the festivities was Taylor Swift, who hasn’t attended the star-studded charity event in almost 10 years. Although she and Travis Kelce weren’t there, there is a very logical reason as to why. Swift and Kelce were reportedly invited to Monday’s Met Gala in Manhattan, but they could not make it because of scheduling conflicts, sources told TMZ . The last time the superstar couple were spotted together was on March 14, when they dined out at Del Frisco’s Grille at Brookfield Place. Before that, the had not been seen out for a month after the Kansas City Chiefs’ Super Bowl loss to the Philadelphia Eagles. More recently, Kelce was photographed shooting a commercial in Manhattan on May 2 – just days before the Met Gala – which fueled speculation that he might accompany the singer to the event. Forbes The Best Red-Carpet Looks At The Met Gala 2025 By Laia Farran Graves Held annually on the first Monday in May, the Met Gala brings together hundreds of celebrities to raise money for the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Costume Institute. Standout moments this year included Rihanna revealing her pregnancy on the museum’s steps and Diana Ross making her glamorous return after 22 years. Inside, Stevie Wonder and Usher also performed for guests. This year’s theme was “Superfine: Tailoring Black Style,” which explored “the role of sartorial style in forming Black identities, focusing on the emergence, significance, and proliferation of the Black dandy,” according to Vogue . The theme was inspired by guest curator Monica Miller’s 2009 book, Slaves to Fashion: Black Dandyism and the Styling of Black Diasporic Identity . Meanwhile, the dress code for 2025 was “tailored for you,” a nod to the exhibition’s focus on menswear. It marked the first time the exhibition adopted a menswear-focused dress code since 2003’s “Men in Skirts.” When Was The Last Time Taylor Swift Attended The Met Gala? NEW YORK, NY – MAY 02: Taylor Swift attends the “Manus x Machina: Fashion In An Age Of Technology” ... More Costume Institute Gala at Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 2, 2016 in New York City. (Photo by Larry Busacca/Getty Images) Taylor Swift attended the Met Gala every year from 2008 to 2016. Her last appearance was almost a decade ago in 2016, when she co-chaired the event alongside Jony Ive, Idris Elba, and Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour. Meanwhile, her NFL star beau Kelce has never been a guest. The 1989 singer wore a metallic Louis Vuitton dress paired with boots. Her hair was styled in a bleach-blonde bob (also known as her “Bleachella” era) and she sported a dark lip. In 2016, the Met Gala celebrated the theme “Manus x Machina: Fashion in an Age of Technology.” What Have Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce Been Up To Recently? BALTIMORE, MARYLAND – JANUARY 28: Travis Kelce #87 of the Kansas City Chiefs celebrates with Taylor ... More Swift after a 17-10 victory against the Baltimore Ravens in the AFC Championship Game at M&T Bank Stadium on January 28, 2024 in Baltimore, Maryland. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images) Swift and Kelce have kept a low-profile since the Chief’s Super Bowl LIX appearance in February. The singer was absent from iHeartRadio Music Awards in March, where she received the Tour of the Century award. Instead, she pre-recorded her acceptance speech. “Thank you so much to iHeart, and thank you so much mainly to the fans. Tour of the Century. I really can’t tell you how much this means to me because I accept this on behalf of all my tour mates, all my fellow performers, my band, everyone who toured with us, our crew,” she said in the video. She continued, “People often say that the greatest challenges in life end up being something you’re so proud of, or end up being the most gratifying feeling in the end if you can rise to the occasion, and this tour was absolutely the most challenging thing I’ve ever done in my life.” The singer concluded, “I appreciate this more than you know, thank you so much for honoring this tour.” A source told People in April that Swift and Kelce have been on the road enjoying their time together. “They have been traveling nonstop and very much enjoy it,” a source told the site. “They are making the most of their time off together. They are hanging out with friends, too. It’s a special time for them.” The insider added that stars are “very serious and in sync,” adding, “They value the same things. Right now, the focus is very much on private time out of the spotlight.” So, will we see the couple attend any public events going forward? According to a report from Us Weekly last month, one source told the site that Kelce and Swift intend to be more private. (Still, we expected Swift will return to the sidelines to support Kelce once football season kicks off this fall.) “Taylor and Travis have learned that so much attention on their relationship is not the best thing,” the insider said. “Travis wants to take [a breather] from the public eye. He was working too much last year, and he didn’t play as well as he wanted. He wants to have a good season [later this year] and not have the focus be on his relationship with Taylor.” Swift was likely unable to attend the Met Gala in previous years due to the Eras Tour. She played 149 shows across six continents in the career-spanning concert. The tour grossed $2 billion in ticket sales, which is twice as much as any other tour in history, according to The New York Times . Swift and Kelce first sparked dating rumors in September 2023, after the singer was seen at the NFL star’s football games. They confirmed their relationship a month later when they were photographed holding hands at a Saturday Night Live after party. Since then, they have publicly supported one another’s careers. Swift wore a “T” necklace while cheering Kelce on at the Super Bowl in February, while Kelce has attended multiple stops on her Eras Tour. “It’s the life I chose, I guess. I have fun with it,” Kelce told CBS News when asked about embracing the spotlight with his relationship with Swift. “It comes with the territory.” Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/monicamercuri/2025/05/06/will-taylor-swift-be-at-the-2025-met-gala-heres-what-to-know/

You may also like

TAO is Elon Musk, who invested in OpenAI, and Subnet is Sam Altman

Most of the capital invested in TAO will ultimately subsidize development activities that do not provide value back to token holders.

The era of "mass coin distribution" on public chains comes to an end

The market is becoming increasingly intelligent, and they are abandoning ecosystems that rely solely on funding to support false activity. Now, what is being rewarded is real throughput, real users, and real revenue.

Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?

What exactly is RaveDAO? Why is Rave able to rise so much?

1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars

Liquidity saved Polkadot's life.

After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?

The US has taken away Iran’s most important card, but has also lost the path to ending the war

Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions

The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.


There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."


Question One: Is this encryption the same as Signal's encryption?


No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.


In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.


X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.


This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.


The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.


The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.


After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."


From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.


In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.



As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."


Issue 2: Does Grok know what you're messaging in private?


Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.


For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.


This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.


There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."


Issue 3: Why is there no Android version?


X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.


In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.



WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.


X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.


These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.


Elon Musk's "Super App"


This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.



X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.


Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.


The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.


X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.


The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.


Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more