NVIDIA's Jensen Huang's new article: The "Five-Layer Cake" of AI
Original Title: AI Is a Five‑Layer Cake
Original Author: Nvidia
Original Compiler: Peggy, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: Artificial intelligence is gradually evolving from a cutting-edge technology into the infrastructure that supports the operation of the modern economy. In its first long article published on its official account, Nvidia attempts to systematically outline the industrial structure of AI from first principles: from energy and chips to data center infrastructure, and then to models and applications, forming a complete five-layer technology stack.
The article points out that AI is not just a competition of software or models, but a global industrial construction involving energy, computing power, manufacturing, and applications, the scale of which may become one of the largest infrastructure expansions in human history. Through this "five-layer cake" perspective, Nvidia aims to illustrate that the true significance of AI is not just smarter software, but an infrastructure revolution on par with electricity and the internet.
Here is the original text:
Artificial intelligence is one of the most powerful forces shaping the world today. It is not a smart application, nor is it a single model, but an infrastructure as important as electricity and the internet.
AI operates on real hardware, real energy, and real economic systems. It transforms raw materials into scalable "intelligence." Every company will use it, and every country will build it.
To understand why AI is unfolding in this way, it is helpful to start from first principles and examine what fundamental changes have occurred in the field of computing.
From "Pre-packaged Software" to "Real-time Generated Intelligence"
For most of the history of computing, software has been "pre-packaged." Humans first describe an algorithm, and then the computer executes it according to instructions. Data must be carefully structured, stored in tables, and retrieved through precise queries. SQL is indispensable because it allows this entire system to function.
AI breaks this model.
For the first time, we have a computer that can understand unstructured information. It can see images, read text, listen to sounds, and understand their meanings; it can reason about context and intent. More importantly, it can generate intelligence in real-time.
Every response is a new generation. Every answer depends on the context you provide. It is no longer software retrieving existing instructions from a database, but software reasoning in real-time and generating intelligence on demand.
Because intelligence is generated in real-time, the entire computing technology stack that supports it must also be reinvented.
AI as Infrastructure
From an industrial perspective, AI can actually be broken down into a five-layer structure.
Energy
At the bottom layer is energy.
Real-time generated intelligence requires real-time generated power. The generation of each token means electrons are moving, heat is being managed, and energy is being converted into computing power.
Below this layer, there is no abstraction. Energy is the first principle of AI infrastructure and the fundamental constraint that determines how much intelligence the system can produce.
Chips
Above energy are chips. The design goal of these processors is to convert energy into computing power with extreme efficiency and at scale.
AI workloads require massive parallel computing capabilities, high-bandwidth memory, and high-speed interconnects. Advances at the chip layer determine the speed of AI expansion and how cheap "intelligence" will ultimately become.
Infrastructure
Above chips is infrastructure. This includes land, power delivery, cooling systems, construction engineering, network systems, and scheduling systems that organize thousands of processors into a single machine.
These systems are essentially AI factories. They are not designed to store information but to manufacture intelligence.
Models
Above infrastructure are models. AI models can understand various types of information: language, biology, chemistry, physics, finance, medicine, and the real world itself.
Language models are just one type. One of the most transformative works is happening in the following areas: protein AI, chemistry AI, physical simulation, robotics, autonomous systems.
Applications
At the top layer is the applications layer, where real economic value is generated. For example, drug discovery platforms, industrial robots, legal copilots, and self-driving cars.
A self-driving car is essentially an "AI application carried by a machine"; a humanoid robot is an "AI application carried by a body." The underlying technology stack is the same; only the final presentation form differs.
Thus, this is the five-layer structure of AI: Energy → Chips → Infrastructure → Models → Applications. Every successful application pulls all levels downwards, all the way to the power plants at the bottom layer that supply it.
An Infrastructure Build Still in Its Early Stages
We have only just begun this construction. The current investment scale is only a few hundred billion dollars, while in the future, infrastructure worth trillions of dollars still needs to be built.
Globally, we are seeing: chip factories, computer assembly plants, AI factories.
An unprecedented scale is being constructed. This is becoming one of the largest infrastructure builds in human history.
Labor Demand in the AI Era
The scale of labor required to support this construction is enormous.
AI factories need: electricians, plumbers, pipe installers, steel structure workers, network technicians, equipment installers, and operations personnel.
These are all highly technical, well-paying positions, and there is currently a severe shortage. Participating in this transformation does not necessarily require a PhD in computer science.
At the same time, AI is driving productivity increases in the knowledge economy. Take radiology as an example. AI has begun to assist in medical imaging interpretation, yet the demand for radiologists continues to grow.
This is not contradictory.
The true responsibility of a radiologist is to care for patients, and reading images is just one of their tasks. As AI takes over more repetitive tasks, doctors can devote more time to judgment, communication, and treatment.
Increased efficiency in hospitals can serve more patients, thus requiring more manpower. Productivity creates capability, and capability creates growth.
What Changes Have Occurred in the Past Year?
In the past year, AI has crossed a critical threshold.
Models are now good enough to truly function in large-scale scenarios.
- Significant improvements in reasoning capabilities
- Significant reductions in hallucinations
- Substantial enhancements in "grounding" with the real world
For the first time, AI-based applications are beginning to create real economic value.
There is already a clear product-market fit in the following areas: drug development, logistics, customer service, software development, and manufacturing.
These applications are powerfully driving the entire underlying technology stack.
The Role of Open Source Models
Open source models play a key role in this. The vast majority of AI models in the world are free. Researchers, startups, enterprises, and even entire countries rely on open source models to compete in advanced AI.
When open source models reach the technological frontier, they not only change software but also activate demand across the entire technology stack.
DeepSeek-R1 is a typical example. By making a powerful reasoning model widely available, it has driven rapid growth at the applications layer while also increasing demand for training computing power, infrastructure, chips, and energy.
What Does This Mean?
When you view AI as infrastructure, everything becomes clear. AI may have begun with Transformers and large language models, but it is far more than that.
It is an industrial-level transformation that will reshape:
- The way energy is produced and consumed
- The way factories are built
- The way work is organized
- The patterns of economic growth
AI factories are being built because intelligence can now be generated in real-time. Chips are being redesigned because efficiency determines the speed of intelligence expansion. Energy is becoming central because it determines how much intelligence the system can produce at most. Applications are exploding because models have finally crossed the threshold of "scale availability."
Each layer reinforces the others.
This is why this construction is so vast, why it will simultaneously impact so many industries, and why it will not be limited to any one country or field.
Every company will use AI.
Every country will build AI.
We are still in the early stages.
A lot of infrastructure has yet to be built, a lot of labor has yet to be trained, and a lot of opportunities have yet to be realized.
But the direction is already very clear.
Artificial intelligence is becoming the foundational infrastructure of the modern world.
And the choices we make today, the speed of construction, the breadth of participation, and the responsibility of deployment will determine what this era will ultimately become.
You may also like

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.

Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.

White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.

Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders

What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026

Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching

Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.

Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.

Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery

Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.

WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight

Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.





