TRON Industry Weekly Report: Stubborn Inflation and Oil Prices May Continue to Affect BTC Rebound, Detailed Analysis of On-Chain Reinsurance Market's Liquidity Infrastructure Re Protocol

I. Outlook

1. Summary of Macroeconomic Trends and Future Predictions

This week, the global macro trading narrative focused on "marginal cooling of U.S. inflation, weakening consumption, but energy shocks make monetary policy difficult to shift towards easing." The U.S. July CPI rose by 0.1% month-on-month, with the year-on-year rate dropping from 3.5% to 3.4%. The core CPI also fell from 2.6% to 2.5%, indicating that underlying inflation continues to decline slowly. Meanwhile, July retail sales unexpectedly fell by 0.6% month-on-month, combined with previously weak employment data, suggesting that U.S. demand and labor market momentum are weakening. However, the situation in the Middle East and supply disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz remain the biggest macro variables: the IEA further downgraded its global oil demand and supply forecasts for 2026, and global inventories have significantly decreased. This week, WTI and Brent crude oil closed at approximately $82.40 and $88.52, respectively, with weekly increases of about 5.4% and 5.9%, reconstituting input-driven inflation pressure. Therefore, the Federal Reserve is currently in a typical dilemma of "growth cooling but inflation still above target," maintaining the federal funds rate at 3.50% - 3.75% during the July meeting, with significant internal disagreement on whether further rate hikes are necessary. Following the release of inflation and consumption data this week, U.S. Treasuries and the dollar weakened temporarily, but the 10-year Treasury yield ultimately remained around the high of approximately 4.70%. Overall, the macro environment this week does not align with the traditional notion of "inflation reduction → interest rate cuts," but is closer to a gradual slowdown in growth, improvement in core inflation, while energy and geopolitical risks keep global rates elevated in a stagflation-like pull.

Next week, the macro market is expected to revolve around whether "growth data can further support economic cooling, and whether energy inflation forces central banks to maintain a hawkish stance." In the U.S., the market will focus on the Federal Reserve's July meeting minutes, PMI, industrial production, and real estate data. Against the backdrop of declining CPI and significantly weakening retail sales, if subsequent economic data continues to be weak, expectations for further Fed rate hikes may continue to cool, putting downward pressure on short-term Treasury yields and the dollar. However, as long as oil prices remain high, it will be difficult for the market to quickly shift to a clear rate-cutting trade. Europe and the UK will closely observe PMI, UK employment, and inflation data. High energy costs mean that the European Central Bank and the Bank of England also face policy constraints of "economic growth under pressure, inflation risks resurfacing." Therefore, the baseline scenario is that the global macro environment will remain in a phase of high interest rates, high energy prices, and cooling growth in the coming week, with major central banks more likely to maintain a wait-and-see approach rather than quickly shift to easing. The biggest upside risk remains the deterioration of the situation in the Strait of Hormuz, leading to a rapid breakthrough of oil prices to new highs, thereby pushing global inflation expectations and long-term Treasury yields higher. Conversely, if geopolitical tensions ease and energy prices significantly decline, the combination of "declining inflation + slowing growth" will strengthen market expectations for a shift towards easing monetary policy in the future.

2. Market Movements and Alerts in the Crypto Industry

This week, the overall crypto market exhibited a pattern of rising and then continuously falling, with BTC's decline greater than ETH's, and altcoins showing divergence, primarily due to price pressure. BTC opened at approximately $64,845 on August 10, surged to $65,322 during the day, but then fell consecutively, closing at about $62,976 on August 14, and around $63,000 as of August 15, marking a cumulative decline of about 2.9% since the opening on August 10. ETH was around $1,880 as of the 15th, down about 1.8% over the past week. SOL was around $75.4, down about 0.7% for the week, XRP was about $1.00, down about 3.7% for the week, while TRX showed relative resilience, around $0.331, up about 0.7% for the week. Notably, the price movements this week were particularly impacted by the unexpected reduction of 23,000 jobs in the July U.S. employment data, which temporarily lowered expectations for Fed rate hikes and pushed BTC back above $65,000 around the 10th. However, the subsequently released softer CPI/PPI data did not further drive up coin prices, and BTC instead fell back towards $63,000, indicating that favorable macro data is increasingly unable to effectively stimulate risk appetite. Meanwhile, weakened demand for Bitcoin ETFs, the U.S. SEC's temporary cancellation of the planned public meeting to discuss crypto financing rules, and the lack of progress on the CLARITY Act during the Senate recess further dampened market sentiment, causing BTC to drop from around $65,000 at the beginning of the week to about $63,000 by the weekend.

Next week, it is crucial to observe whether BTC can hold the $62,000 - $63,000 range: BTC has currently fallen to around $62,970 and is near/below the 50-day moving average. If regulatory expectations continue to weaken and ETF demand does not recover, breaking below recent lows may further open up downward space. Conversely, if it can regain stability above $64,000 - $65,000, it would indicate that the downward pressure from this week is beginning to ease. For ETH, the focus should be on the $1,850 - $1,900 range, for SOL on $75, and for XRP on the $1 mark. If these levels are effectively broken, volatility in altcoins may significantly increase.

3. Industry and Sector Hotspots

The technical hotspot of AI Agent × Crypto further focuses on machine-native payments and programmable authorizations, with x402-type protocols driving Agents to automatically complete pay-per-use through APIs, accompanied by mechanisms such as API Key/Session Key, Allowlist, single transaction limits, KYA (Know Your Agent), and streaming settlement. This indicates that competition in the sector is shifting from "AI Agents issuing tokens" to a complete execution stack of Agent Wallet + Identity + Policy Engine + Stablecoin Settlement.

Overall, the most noteworthy technical trend this week is not a new single narrative, but rather the convergence of RWA, stablecoins, AI Agents, and high-performance public chains within the same "on-chain financial execution stack"—with programmable transactions initiated by AI Agents/institutions at the upper layer, execution controlled through identity, compliance, and authorization strategies at the middle layer, and value settlement completed with stablecoins at the bottom layer, relying on higher throughput, sub-second finality, and atomic settlement infrastructure.

II. Market Hotspot Sectors and Potential Projects of the Week

1. Overview of Potential Projects

1.1. Analysis of Total Financing of $21.5 Million, with participation from institutions such as Base Ecosystem Fund, Pantera, and Sequoia—Multipli, an on-chain yield infrastructure that tokenizes institutional-level arbitrage returns.

Introduction

Multipli.fi is a decentralized, multi-chain yield infrastructure protocol focused on providing real and risk-adjusted returns for assets that traditionally struggle to generate yields (such as BTC, ETH, stablecoins, and tokenized RWA). The protocol aggregates and tokenizes institutional-level fund strategies, such as delta-neutral strategies (market-neutral), contango, and funding rate arbitrage, generating freely tradable xTokens that allow users to obtain institutional-level returns on-chain.

Its proprietary AlphaIQ engine dynamically allocates funds to the best-performing strategies while maintaining liquidity and DeFi composability, enhancing yield efficiency.

Brief Overview of Protocol Mechanism

rwaUSD Mechanism

1. Collateral Selection Principles: Only high liquidity RWA is accepted.

rwaUSD specifically uses institutional-grade, high-liquidity real-world assets (RWA) as underlying collateral, mainly including:

• Short-term U.S. Treasury Bills (T-Bills)
• Highly liquid tokenized gold
• Other publicly traded RWA with continuous pricing and deep market liquidity

These assets possess price transparency, ample liquidity, and rapid redemption capabilities, meeting the collateral requirements of DeFi liquidation mechanisms.

2. Introducing Insurance Mechanisms to Enhance Security

To further enhance stability and market trust, rwaUSD plans to integrate an insurance system underwritten by Lloyd's of London.

Insurance primarily covers:

• De-pegging of underlying collateral assets
• Risks arising from specific regulatory policy changes
• Fraud and failure risks at the custody institution or collateral asset level

Through a dual structure of "high-quality collateral + insurance protection," the system's risk resistance capability is improved.

3. As a General Collateral Asset for DeFi

Leveraging high liquidity RWA and insurance mechanisms, rwaUSD is designed as a foundational collateral asset (Collateral Primitive) widely used in the DeFi ecosystem, capable of supporting various on-chain financial scenarios such as lending, leverage, and yield strategies.

4. Not Mixing Low Liquidity RWA

Multipli will not include all RWA assets in the same system.

The following assets are excluded from the rwaUSD collateral pool:

• Private Equity
• Private Credit
• Structured Fund Products
• Assets with long lock-up periods or redemption cycles

The reason is that these assets have poor liquidity under market pressure, which can easily affect overall solvency.

Thus, Multipli adopts high liquidity RWA into the rwaUSD system, while low liquidity RWA enters independent liquidity pools (Segmented Liquidity Classes) to avoid contagion of different risk-level assets.

rwaUSD Architecture and Core Logic

1. Positioning of rwaUSD: A Unified Collateral Layer for RWA

rwaUSD can be understood as a "Universal Collateral Adapter for RWA."

Its core goal is not to issue new RWA but to standardize and convert high-quality RWA from different issuers and types into a collateral asset that can be widely used in DeFi.

2. Layered Responsibilities

rwaUSD isolates complexity at the underlying level through a unified interface.

Asset Issuers

• Responsible for asset issuance and compliance operations
• Manage underlying assets such as government bonds and gold

Multipli

• Responsible for asset aggregation
• Risk standardization
• Solvency management
• Maintenance of collateral frameworks

DeFi Protocols

• Focused on lending, liquidity, and yield strategies
• No need to adapt to each type of RWA separately

This design achieves separation of responsibilities, enhancing the scalability of the entire ecosystem.

3. Addressing the Fragmentation of RWA

As more institutions put assets on-chain:

• Tokens of government bonds from different issuers
• Different gold tokens
• Various public market RWAs

This will create numerous independent liquidity pools.

If each DeFi protocol integrates separately:

• OUSG
• BUIDL
• TBILL
• Tokenized Gold
• Other RWAs

It will incur significant integration and maintenance costs.

4. The Solution of rwaUSD

rwaUSD packages these underlying assets into a composable, lendable, and tradable standard asset.

DeFi protocols only need to integrate rwaUSD once to indirectly access the liquidity of the entire RWA market.

How rwaUSD Works

1. Project Positioning: A standardized entry for RWA into DeFi

Currently, there are a large number of on-chain:

* Tokenized government bonds * Money market funds * Tokenized gold

However, liquidity is dispersed, and risk control standards are not unified, making it difficult to directly enter DeFi.

rwaUSD converts different RWAs into a standardized collateral asset through a unified risk framework.

2. Key Actors

3. Core System Components

Collateral Vault

• Custody of underlying RWAs
• Management of assets by liquidity level

Risk Engine

Responsible for:

* Asset admission review * Haircut settings * MTV settings * Risk buffer management * Liquidity level classification

Mint / Burn Module

Responsible for:

* Minting rwaUSD * Burning rwaUSD * Supply control * Liquidation management

Transparency Layer

Discloses:

* Collateral composition * Risk exposure * Liquidity layering * Solvency indicators

4. Lloyd's Insurance Mechanism

rwaUSD plans to introduce:

**Lloyd's of London** insurance support.

Covered risks include:

* Collateral decoupling * Specific regulatory shocks * Custodian fraud * Underlying asset failure

However, insurance is just an additional layer of protection.

The system's security still primarily relies on:

* Over-collateralization * MTV restrictions * Liquidity layering * Risk control mechanisms

Not on the insurance itself.

Lifecycle

Step 0: Asset Admission

Assets need to be reviewed before entering the system:

* Token verification * Issuer due diligence * Custodian review * Liquidity analysis * Redemption capability assessment

This is one of the core values of Multipli.

Step 1: Deposit Collateral

Users will deposit:

* Government bond tokens * Gold tokens * Compliant RWAs

Into the collateral framework.

Step 2: Mint rwaUSD

The system generates rwaUSD based on risk parameters.

Key Indicator:

**MTV (Mint-to-Value)**
Determines how much rwaUSD can be minted at most.

Step 3: Deploy to DeFi

After obtaining rwaUSD, it can be directly used for:

* Lending markets * Liquidity pools * Yield strategies * Institutional allocation channels

At this point, the originally static RWA begins to generate additional capital efficiency.

Step 4: Redeem and Exit

Users receive:

* Original collateral assets

or

• Equivalent redeemable assets

5. Liquidity Layering Design

Different assets adopt different redemption mechanisms.

High Liquidity Assets

For example:
* Short-term government bonds * Gold
**Characteristics**:
* Quick redemption * More aligned with DeFi needs

Low Liquidity Assets

For example:
* Assets with redemption windows * RWAs with poor liquidity
**Characteristics**:
* Independent liquidity pools * Do not affect the overall system liquidity

Avoiding risk contagion.

Yield Mechanics for rwaUSD

rwaUSD itself is not a yield-bearing asset but a yield-enabling primitive.

Its role is:

* Standardizing RWA collateral * Aggregating on-chain liquidity * Providing a unified yield vehicle for DeFi and institutions

Yield Source 1: Deployment in DeFi Markets

Minted rwaUSD can enter various DeFi scenarios like stablecoins:

Yield Source 2: Multipli Delegated Yield Management

For institutions, DAO Treasuries, or large fund managers:

• Do not wish to frequently manage multiple protocols
• Lack professional DeFi teams
• More focused on stable execution and risk management

Multipli provides Curated Allocation (selected yield strategies).

Users can allocate rwaUSD to specified asset management strategies.

Asset managers may configure:

* DeFi lending markets * Liquidity strategies * Money market instruments * Institutional liquidity channels * On-chain arbitrage strategies

Users do not need to operate the underlying protocols themselves.

In summary, rwaUSD does not directly generate yield but serves as a unified RWA collateral and liquidity layer, transforming tokenized government bonds, gold, and other assets into productive capital that can be efficiently allocated in DeFi and institutional yield strategies, thereby unlocking the yield potential of on-chain RWAs worth billions of dollars.

Tron Commentary

Multipli's advantage lies in its construction of a unified yield infrastructure connecting RWA, institutional yield strategies, and DeFi liquidity, standardizing high liquidity RWAs such as government bonds and gold into rwaUSD, and utilizing the AlphaIQ™ engine and institutional-level Delta Neutral strategies (such as futures arbitrage and funding rate arbitrage) to optimize yields, allowing originally yield-less BTC, ETH, stablecoins, and RWAs to achieve real, risk-adjusted returns; at the same time, employing liquidity layering, risk engines, and insurance enhancement mechanisms to improve asset security and institutional acceptability.

Its disadvantage is that yield performance largely depends on the ongoing effectiveness of the underlying asset managers and arbitrage strategies, with risks of narrowing strategy yields and declining Alpha due to changes in market conditions; additionally, the admission, custody, insurance, and compliance systems for RWA assets increase operational complexity, while rwaUSD, as an intermediary asset, requires sufficient institutional adoption and DeFi integration to fully unleash network effects.

2. Key Project Insights of the Week

2.1. Analysis of $21 Million Total Financing Led by Coinbase and Electric Capital, with Follow-On Investments from Tribe, Framework, Stratos, and Morgan Creek - Building Liquidity Infrastructure for On-Chain Reinsurance Market Re Protocol

Introduction

Re Protocol connects decentralized finance (DeFi) with the global reinsurance market. Built on blockchain technology, Re Protocol aims to bring greater transparency, operational efficiency, and accessibility to an industry worth trillions of dollars that has long been highly opaque and reliant on numerous intermediaries.

Core System Architecture Analysis

reUSD: Insurance Risk-Backed Yield-Bearing Dollar Asset

reUSD is a yield-bearing stable asset issued by Re Protocol, with underlying returns sourced from premium income in the global reinsurance market, rather than traditional DeFi lending rates or funding rate arbitrage.

Core Logic:

Essentially, reUSD = On-Chain Version of Insurance Float

Source of Returns

Mainly from:

• Reinsurance contract premiums
• Risk underwriting returns
• Insurance capital allocation returns

Thus, it has a low correlation with the cryptocurrency market cycle.

Risk Structure

Capital effectively bears the insurance risk.

If claims < premium income, then capital earns returns.

If a major disaster leads to payouts exceeding expectations, capital may incur losses.

Therefore:

reUSD essentially belongs to yield-bearing risk assets, rather than ordinary stablecoins.

reUSDe: Yield Re-Staking Version

reUSDe can be understood as: reUSD + Yield Accumulation Mechanism

Operational Logic

Users:

Subsequently:

• Premium income continues to accumulate
• Returns automatically compound
• Net value continues to grow

Analysis of reUSD & reUSDe Mechanism

Dual Token Structure

Re Protocol adopts a layered capital structure, issuing two types of yield assets:

Among them, reUSD is similar to senior capital in the insurance market, pursuing stable returns and stronger protection; reUSDe is akin to junior capital, taking on more risk for potentially higher returns.

Yield Mechanism

Returns mainly come from two parts:

First Part: Reinsurance Business Returns

The protocol provides funds to vetted reinsurance companies in the form of Surplus Notes to support insurance underwriting. Once deployed, the funds can earn insurance premium income and SOFR (Secured Overnight Financing Rate) returns.

Second Part: On-Chain Idle Funds Returns

Funds not yet involved in insurance business are stored within the protocol, earning returns through Ethena's sUSDe Basis Trade.

Thus, overall returns consist of:

Reinsurance returns + On-Chain funds returns + Tranche yield premium

Capital Protection Mechanism

Re Protocol employs a three-tier loss absorption structure:

This means that even in the event of significant insurance payouts, the capital of reinsurance companies will be consumed first before impacting reUSDe, and finally affecting reUSD.

Thus, the safety of reUSD is significantly higher than that of reUSDe.

Surplus Note Model

The protocol does not directly participate in insurance business but provides capital to reinsurance companies through Surplus Notes.

Surplus Notes are common subordinate capital instruments in the U.S. insurance industry, with a repayment order lower than policyholders but recognized by regulators as insurance capital.

For insurance companies:

• Increases underwriting capacity
• Improves capital adequacy ratio
• Reduces financing costs

For Re Protocol:

• Gains real insurance premium income
• Brings insurance cash flow on-chain

Redemption Mechanism

Risk Control System

The protocol combines traditional insurance industry risk control with DeFi risk control:

All trust asset balances, premium income, and claims expenditures are synchronized on-chain via Chainlink, achieving near real-time transparent management.

Tron Commentary

The advantage of Re Protocol lies in its ability to bring the traditionally highly closed reinsurance market on-chain, allowing DeFi users to access returns from real insurance premiums and reinsurance business through the layered capital structure of reUSD (senior) and reUSDe (junior), rather than relying on cryptocurrency market lending rates or funding rate arbitrage, thus providing a source of returns with low correlation to the crypto market; at the same time, by combining Surplus Notes, Chainlink reserve proofs, Fireblocks custody, actuarial audits, and insurance capital buffer mechanisms, it enhances transparency and risk management levels, granting yield assets strong DeFi composability.

Its disadvantage is that the underlying returns ultimately depend on the performance of the reinsurance business and insurance payout situations, posing risks of declining returns or even capital losses due to extreme disaster events; additionally, the protocol involves multiple aspects such as insurance regulation, off-chain trust accounts, actuarial assessments, and institutional partnerships, making the overall structure more complex compared to purely on-chain protocols, and introducing a certain degree of off-chain execution and compliance reliance.

3. Industry Data Analysis

---

1. Overall Market Performance

1.1. Spot BTC vs ETH Price Trends

BTC

ETH

4. Macroeconomic Data Review and Key Data Release Points for Next Week

---

This week, the macro theme is the marginal cooling of U.S. inflation, but consumption has clearly weakened. The U.S. July CPI rose 0.1% month-on-month and 3.4% year-on-year, further down from June's 3.5%; core CPI year-on-year fell to 2.5%, indicating some easing of inflation pressure. July PPI also showed that production-side price pressures have cooled, but remain at high levels; meanwhile, July retail sales unexpectedly fell 0.6% month-on-month, significantly weaker than market expectations, indicating that consumer spending momentum is beginning to weaken. Overall, "cooling inflation + weakening consumption" reduces the urgency for the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates further in September, but oil prices and geopolitical risks still limit the space for policy shifts.

Key Points for Next Week (August 17 - August 21)

5. Regulatory Policies

---

United States

From August 10 to 15, 2026, the core of U.S. crypto regulation continues to revolve around the market structure of digital assets and the SEC regulatory framework. The "CLARITY Act" was not able to advance this week due to the Senate entering its summer recess, with key votes postponed until September; meanwhile, the SEC originally planned to hold a public meeting on August 14 to review the new "Regulation Crypto Assets" framework, which involves exemptions for crypto project financing, registration exemptions for up to several years, and safe harbor for investment contracts, and planned to discuss innovations related to tokenized securities exemptions, but the meeting was canceled due to scheduling reasons and a new date has not yet been announced, causing a short-term delay in U.S. crypto securities regulatory reform.

On the other hand, the OCC is signaling a more proactive approach to digital asset banking regulation, encouraging more crypto and digital asset companies to apply for federal banking licenses, indicating that the U.S. is exploring ways to further integrate compliant crypto institutions into the traditional banking regulatory system.

United Kingdom

The UK's regulatory focus this week is primarily on preparing for the upcoming comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto assets. The UK has shifted from a previous regulatory model centered on anti-money laundering registration to a complete financial services authorization system covering trading platforms, custody, stablecoin issuance, trading, and staking. The FCA has determined that relevant businesses need to apply for formal authorization under the new system, and existing registration will not automatically convert to the new license.

It is important to note that this week is more about the preparation phase for the implementation of the new system, rather than the introduction of a completely new set of regulatory rules. Therefore, the FCA's final rules published on June 30 should not be counted again as new policies for August 10-15.

EU

During the period from August 10 to 15, there were no new core MiCA regulations officially coming into effect or significant new legislation in the EU. The main regulatory focus remains on the comprehensive implementation of MiCA and the first round of system reviews. The final national transition period for MiCA will end before July 1, 2026, meaning that current EU crypto businesses have fully entered a unified licensing and regulatory system. Meanwhile, the European Commission is advancing the MiCA Review, assessing whether adjustments are needed to the current system in areas such as stablecoins, CASP, DeFi, staking, lending, and tokenized assets. Therefore, a more accurate definition for this week is "comprehensive implementation of MiCA + ongoing system review," rather than the emergence of new significant regulatory legislation.