X Pulls the Plug — the Era of “Talking Your Way to Traffic” Comes to an End.
Source: TechFlow (Shenchao)
X has shut down “tweet-to-earn.”
Yesterday, X’s Head of Product Nikita Bier announced that any application that rewards users for posting will have its API access revoked.
He added—almost considerately—that affected developers are welcome to contact the team, and X will help them migrate to Threads or Bluesky.
“The landlord kicks you out—and even helps arrange the moving truck.”
As soon as the news broke, the InfoFi sector collapsed across the board. KAITO fell by 20%, Cookie dropped by 20%, and the Kaito Yappers community, with 157,000 members, was shut down entirely.
Less than an hour later, Kaito founder Yu Hu published a long-form statement.
The post contained no apology to the community and no protest against X’s policy change. Its core message was straightforward:
Move elsewhere.

Yaps is being discontinued. The new product is called Kaito Studio, which will follow a more traditional marketing model—one-to-one partnerships between brands and creators—moving away from the open, points-farming system where anyone could participate.
Twitter is no longer the priority. The focus will shift to YouTube and TikTok.
The crypto niche is no longer the sole target either; the expansion is toward finance, AI, and the broader creator economy—a market worth USD 200 billion.
The product is ready.
The direction is clear.
The data is in place.
And a new narrative has been formed.
Still, this does not feel like an emergency response written within an hour. It feels more like something prepared in advance—kept in a drawer, waiting for X to make the first move.
At the same time, there were earlier signals on-chain.
Kaito’s multisig contract previously distributed 24 million KAITO tokens to five addresses. One of those addresses transferred 5 million KAITO in full to Binance a week ago.
It looks far more like a cash-out at the right moment.

Advance communication.
Advance drafting.
Advance transfer of tokens to exchanges.
Everything that needed to be done was done.
Then, once X made the announcement, the long statement followed immediately—polished, composed, framed as a proactive pivot and an embrace of change.
In the statement, Yu Hu wrote:
“After discussions with X, both parties agreed that a fully permissionless distribution system is no longer viable.”
Agreed.
Being kicked out is reframed as “reaching consensus.”
A product being effectively terminated is repackaged as a strategic upgrade.
This kind of rhetoric is all too familiar in crypto.
Projects never say, “We failed.”
They say they are exploring new possibilities.
They say market conditions have changed.
They say this is a planned transition.
It sounds graceful—but it is also pure PR.
At its core, X’s ban was merely the final blow. The “tweet-to-earn” model was already on its way out.
Mining by posting sounds appealing: tokenizing attention, fairly compensating creators, building a decentralized information economy.
But once deployed in reality, everyone knows how it played out.
If rewards are tied to posting, people post more.
If AI can generate content at scale, AI does the posting.
If accounts are unlimited, people spin up endless alts.
According to CryptoQuant, on January 9 alone, bots generated 7.75 million crypto-related tweets on X, a year-over-year increase of 1,224%.
ZachXBT had already been criticizing this last year, calling InfoFi platforms the primary drivers of AI-generated spam. He even offered a USD 5,000 bounty for user data to identify bot networks.
Genuine discussion was drowned out by endless “GM,” “LFG,” and “bullish.” Humans and bots blended together to the point where telling them apart became nearly impossible.
X’s Head of Product, Nikita Bier, had already posted a warning last week:
“CT is dying from suicide, not from the algorithm.”
Crypto Twitter is killing itself—it isn’t being killed by the algorithm.
At the time, the crypto community mocked him for arrogance and responded with GM memes.
Looking back now, doesn’t it feel like a notice issued before an execution?
Addressing spam, Yu Hu said Kaito had tried everything: raising thresholds, adding filters, redesigning incentives.
None of it worked.
The moment you reward posting with tokens, you are effectively offering a bounty for noise. No threshold can outpace profit-driven behavior. Human incentives are straightforward: as long as rewards exist, spam will not stop.
More critically, the lifeline was never in their own hands.
What business was Kaito really in?
Leveraging X’s traffic, using tokens to incentivize content production, and selling the resulting data to projects for marketing.
X was the foundation. Kaito was the structure built on top.
The moment the owner of the foundation decides to reclaim it, the building collapses. No justification required. No negotiation needed. A single announcement is enough.
InfoFi claims to be about a decentralized attention economy. But the attention layer was never decentralized. The algorithm belongs to the platform. The API belongs to the platform. The users belong to the platform.
You can put points on-chain.
You can decentralize the token.
But you cannot decentralize Twitter.
A parasite attempting to overthrow its host does not trigger a revolution. The host simply pulls the plug.
Over the past few years, Web3 startups have repeatedly pursued this model: borrow Web2 traffic to build Web3 momentum. Users remain on Twitter. Data remains on Twitter. Attention remains on Twitter. But the token is self-issued, and the revenue flows inward.
It sounds clever—using leverage to achieve scale.
But someone else’s traffic will always belong to someone else. Platforms tolerate you only until you become inconvenient. Once you do, parasitic business models collapse instantly.
This should serve as a warning to every Web3 project built on borrowed platform traffic.
If your lifeline is controlled by someone else, then every dollar you earn exists only because it hasn’t yet been taken back.
Ask yourself whether you are building a company—or renting a room.
Renters should not think like landlords, and they certainly should not believe the house is theirs.
Kaito says it will move to YouTube and TikTok next.
But are those landlords really easier to negotiate with than Musk?
You may also like

Arthur Hayes New Post: It's "No Trade" Time Now

Claude Opus 4.7 Review: Is It Worthy of the Title of Strongest Model?

DWF In-Depth Report: AI Outperforms Humans in Yield Farming Optimization in DeFi, But Complex Transactions Still Lag Behind 5x

The financial tricks of the crypto giant Kraken

When proactive market makers start to take initiative

Massive Whale Movement: Unstaking $84.96 Million in HYPE Tokens
Key Takeaways A crypto whale, known as TechnoRevenant, has unstaked approximately $84.96 million in HYPE tokens. The tokens…

ListaDAO Addresses Third-Party Contract Vulnerability Concerns
Key Takeaways GoPlus Security revealed a vulnerability in a contract resembling those of ListaDAO. ListaDAO confirmed that their…

Security Risks of Fake Ledger Nano S+ Devices Emerging Through Chinese E-Commerce
Key Takeaways Counterfeit Ledger Nano S+ devices are being sold on Chinese e-commerce platforms, posing significant risks to…

Wave of Cyber Attacks Hits DeFi Protocols Post-Drift Hack
Key Takeaways A significant $280 million attack on Drift Protocol set off a chain of security breaches across…

Tom Lee Says ‘Mini Crypto Winter’ Is Over, Sees Ether Above $60K
Key Takeaways: Tom Lee predicts Ether’s resurgence, projecting it to surpass $60,000 in the coming years. Bitmine suffered…

French Government Tackles Rising Crypto Safety Concerns
Key Takeaways: France is intensifying measures to counter the surge in crypto kidnappings and wrench attacks. Since early…

Europe’s Bitcoin Treasury Playbook Unlikely to Mirror US Strategy: PBW 2026
Key Takeaways: European firms are adapting unique Bitcoin treasury strategies due to distinct financial regulations and market dynamics…

Circle Confronts Lawsuit Over $280M Drift Protocol Hack
Key Takeaways: Circle faces a lawsuit for allegedly aiding in the transfer of $230 million in stolen USDC.…

Bitcoin Faces ‘Near-Term Selling Pressure’ Following Surge to $76K: CryptoQuant
Key Takeaways: Bitcoin reaches a multi-month high of $76,000, prompting increased deposits to exchanges. CryptoQuant identifies a peak…

Ethereum Foundation Unveils North Korean Infiltration in Web3
Key Takeaways: The Ethereum Foundation’s ETH Rangers program exposed 100 North Korean operatives infiltrating Web3 companies. The Ketman…

Crypto in Sustained Winter as CEX Volumes Drop 39% in Q1
Key Takeaways: Centralized crypto exchange trading volume fell by 39% in Q1 2026 to $2.7 trillion. March saw…

Bitcoiners Should Prepare for Quantum Computing Now, Urges Adam Back
Key Takeaways: Adam Back emphasizes immediate steps toward quantum-resistant solutions for Bitcoin. Quantum computing may disrupt blockchain security…

Cybersecurity Alert: Counterfeit Ledger Devices on Chinese Market
Key Takeaways: Scammers distribute fake Ledger devices via Chinese marketplaces, risking user crypto assets. Victims of a related…
Arthur Hayes New Post: It's "No Trade" Time Now
Claude Opus 4.7 Review: Is It Worthy of the Title of Strongest Model?
DWF In-Depth Report: AI Outperforms Humans in Yield Farming Optimization in DeFi, But Complex Transactions Still Lag Behind 5x
The financial tricks of the crypto giant Kraken
When proactive market makers start to take initiative
Massive Whale Movement: Unstaking $84.96 Million in HYPE Tokens
Key Takeaways A crypto whale, known as TechnoRevenant, has unstaked approximately $84.96 million in HYPE tokens. The tokens…




